|
Home > Tools &
Templates > Think-Aloud Guidelines
Think-Aloud Protocol
Guidelines for User Evaluations
In General
1.
When you
are screening the participants for a study, notice how they respond to your
questions. Decide on a strategy for engaging the participant before they arrive
for the user evaluation.
2.
Be
careful of the social dynamics you set up with the participant.
-
Don’t
joke, indulge in sarcasm, flirt, or show your own nervousness.
-
Maintain
a professional, neutral persona.
-
Keep
yourself “small” in relationship to the participant. Sit slightly back from the
participant, in a chair that is lower.
-
Avoid
wearing heavy perfume or aftershave. The participant may have allergies to the
odor or find it distracting.
-
Don’t
wear suggestive, revealing, or tight, uncomfortable clothes.
3.
Be careful not to bias the participant.
4.
Avoid
interactions with the user that can shift the focus from the user’s domain to
the writer’s.
-
Don’t
expect the user to tell you how to fix problems
-
Don’t
expect the user to answer other questions
-
Always
keep the focus of attention on the user, not yourself. Avoid “I” statements and
long explanations of how the system works.
-
Stay in
the relationship with the participant. Don’t worry about the next question you
are going to ask.
-
Write
down ideas so that you don’t need to worry about forgetting them after the test.
5.
Don’t let
yourself get impatient!
-
When the
participant seems to have a problem, they can often unravel it without your
help.
-
When you
feel you should jump in, count to ten first.
-
If you
jump in too soon, you lose valuable data and they become dependent on your help.
6.
Learn to
probe in a neutral way to get information on which to base your written
improvements
Techniques that encourage thinking aloud
1.
Prompting
2.
Echoing
3.
“Conversational disequilibrium”
4.
Summarizing at key junctions
1.
Prompting
Don’t ask “Do you like the way that “Caution” note as written?”
but “Did that “Caution” note help you reach your goal?”
Don’t be too quick to assume that the user is lost or having a
problem.
Don’t say, “What is your problem here?,” but ask, “What is your
goal?” or “What are you thinking you should do here?”
Don’t show your own interests
or point of view by your comments, emphasis, “waking up” and getting interested,
showing in facial expression or vocal tones that you disagree
What is your goal?
What did you expect when you did that?
How did you expect that to work?
Can you tell me what you were thinking?
What do you want to accomplish here?
Describe the steps you are going through here.
How did you feel about that process?
Tell me about your thinking here.
What did you expect to happen when you . . . .?
2.
Echoing
Echoing
sets up a social dialog and reinforces social conversation expectations: they
say something, you repeat it, they say the next thing because that is what is
expected in conversation.
If they
say, “I’m not sure what to do here,” don’t say, “So you are confused because the
procedure is unclear?”
If they
say, “That didn’t happen like I expected, don’t ask, “So you thought that the an
illustration would be displayed here?”
3.
“Conversational
disequilibrium”
-
Let your
statements trail off and end in an upswing, as if you were asking a question.
The participant will usually complete your statement.
-
Signal
that you are there, you are interested, but that it is still their turn to talk
(mmm hmmmm)
-
Speak
softly
4.
Summarizing at
key junctions
-
When you
have learned something new that is key to understanding, summarize the event and
the thinking that the user explored, very briefly. Users may offer more detail
about their thought process.
-
Keep the
recorder on or keep taking notes after you think that the test session is
finished. Users will often make interesting reflections about their processes
during the casual remarks at the end of the session.
Adapted
from “Methods for successful ‘Thinking-Out-Loud’ procedures” developed by Judy
Ramey, University of Washington,
with additions by Usability Analysis & Design, Xerox Corporation (Pieratti,
1995).
|